94-98
FINALWashington
Wizards
41-45|L10: 2-8
Minnesota
Timberwolves
32-50|L10: 2-8
Washington Wizards
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/23 | L 90-105 | |
| 2/22 |
| — |
| 2 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 6.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 8 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 35-51 | 0.407 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 13 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 23.0 |
| 14 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 25.0 |
| 15 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 29.0 |
| 2/20 | W 112-100 |
| 2/14 | W 92-85 |
| 2/11 | L 73-94 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/23 | L 104-116 | |
| 2/21 | L 95-100 | |
| 2/20 | L 100-112 | |
| 2/14 | W 99-94 | |
| 2/11 | W 109-107 |
| Category | MIN Offense | WAS Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1983.9 ORtg | #25108.6 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2113.0% | #1515.5% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1435.2% | #2837.0% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | WAS Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #21106.2 DRtg | #1285.5 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2714.6% | #210.9% | WAS |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1035.1% | #2234.6% | WAS |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.8 | 41.6% | 35.5% | 81.0% | |
| 20.5 | 43.8% | 32.8% | 63.8% | |
| 19.1 | 45.3% | 17.8% | 77.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.4 |
| 7.9% |
| 83.0% |
| 17.0 | 44.4% | 36.1% | 66.5% |
| 12.3 | 49.8% | 7.7% | 53.1% |