109-126
FINALChicago
Bulls
47-40|L10: 2-8
New
Orleans Pelicans
40-50|L10: 4-6
Chicago Bulls
New Orleans Pelicans
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/22 | L 98-126 | |
| 3/21 |
| — |
| 2 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 2.0 |
| 3 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 5.0 |
| 6 | 46-36 | 0.561 | 7.0 |
| 7 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 8 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 9 | 43-39 | 0.524 | 10.0 |
| 10 | 43-39 | 0.524 | 10.0 |
| 11 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 16.0 |
| 12 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 13 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 28.0 |
| 14 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 30.0 |
| 15 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 31.0 |
| 3/18 | L 102-129 |
| 3/16 | L 110-125 |
| 3/14 | L 103-112 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/21 | L 103-106 | |
| 3/20 | W 117-112 | |
| 3/18 | W 124-91 | |
| 3/15 | L 115-131 | |
| 3/13 | W 130-105 |
| Category | NOP Offense | CHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2196.4 ORtg | #19120.3 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1611.7% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2633.6% | #2736.7% | Even |
| Category | NOP Defense | CHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #21120.5 DRtg | #3101.9 ORtg | NOP |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #814.5% | #1111.2% | NOP |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2136.0% | #736.6% | NOP |
| 27.4 | 49.5% | 23.7% | 80.5% |
| 24.5 | 48.1% | 39.2% | 87.0% |
| 17.8 | 49.1% | 29.1% | 38.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.0 | 45.4% | 36.3% | 59.5% | |
| 23.3 | 48.5% | 32.9% | 80.9% | |
| 17.5 | 53.6% | 25.9% | 64.1% |