109-126
FINALChicago
Bulls
43-37|L10: 3-7
New
Orleans Pelicans
38-44|L10: 4-6
Chicago Bulls
New Orleans Pelicans
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49-26 | 0.653 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/22 | L 98-126 | |
| 3/21 |
| — |
| 2 | 48-28 | 0.632 | 1.5 |
| 3 | 49-29 | 0.628 | 1.5 |
| 4 | 46-29 | 0.613 | 3.0 |
| 5 | 43-32 | 0.573 | 6.0 |
| 6 | 42-33 | 0.560 | 7.0 |
| 7 | 42-34 | 0.553 | 7.5 |
| 8 | 40-36 | 0.526 | 9.5 |
| 9 | 77-72 | 0.517 | 9.0 |
| 10 | 35-41 | 0.461 | 14.5 |
| 11 | 31-46 | 0.403 | 19.0 |
| 12 | 23-52 | 0.307 | 26.0 |
| 13 | 23-56 | 0.291 | 28.0 |
| 14 | 18-56 | 0.243 | 30.5 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 11.5 |
| 3/18 | L 102-129 |
| 3/16 | L 110-125 |
| 3/14 | L 103-112 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/21 | L 103-106 | |
| 3/20 | W 117-112 | |
| 3/18 | W 124-91 | |
| 3/15 | L 115-131 | |
| 3/13 | W 130-105 |
| Category | NOP Offense | CHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2289.0 ORtg | #21111.9 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1210.7% |
CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2633.6% | #2636.7% | Even |
| Category | NOP Defense | CHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #18111.4 DRtg | #694.4 ORtg | NOP |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1013.1% | #810.4% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2036.0% | #736.6% | NOP |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.3 | 50.0% | 30.7% | 83.8% | |
| 24.4 | 47.2% | 38.7% | 79.8% | |
| 18.2 | 48.1% | 29.3% | 40.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.4 |
| 36.3% |
| 59.5% |
| 23.4 | 46.2% | 32.4% | 79.0% |
| 17.2 | 54.0% | 28.0% | 71.9% |