91-106
FINALCleveland
Cavaliers
24-58|L10: 2-8
Oklahoma
City Thunder
65-28|L10: 4-6
Cleveland Cavaliers
Oklahoma City Thunder
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66-16 | 0.805 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/9 | L 105-107 | |
| 11/7 |
| — |
| 2 | 54-28 | 0.659 | 12.0 |
| 3 | 49-32 | 0.605 | 16.5 |
| 4 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 17.0 |
| 5 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 21.0 |
| 6 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 22.0 |
| 7 | 41-40 | 0.506 | 24.5 |
| 8 | 38-44 | 0.463 | 28.0 |
| 9 | 34-48 | 0.415 | 32.0 |
| 10 | 34-48 | 0.415 | 32.0 |
| 11 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 37.0 |
| 12 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 37.0 |
| 13 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 42.0 |
| 14 | 21-61 | 0.256 | 45.0 |
| 15 | 20-62 | 0.244 | 46.0 |
| 11/5 | W 108-101 |
| 11/3 | L 102-105 |
| 11/2 | L 86-115 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/9 | W 105-94 | |
| 11/8 | W 97-91 | |
| 11/6 | W 108-88 | |
| 11/4 | L 95-104 | |
| 11/2 | W 106-92 |
| Category | OKC Offense | CLE Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #689.5 ORtg | #25108.1 DRtg | OKC |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1912.5% | #915.9% | OKC |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #736.5% | #2437.0% | OKC |
| Category | OKC Defense | CLE Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #399.9 DRtg | #2680.9 ORtg | CLE |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2014.7% | #511.5% | CLE |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #634.3% | #2234.5% | CLE |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.5 | 44.4% | 40.4% | 91.7% | |
| 14.7 | 40.4% | 26.9% | 58.5% | |
Anderson Varejão | 14.1 | - | - | - |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.5 |
| 40.8% |
| 89.9% |
| 23.2 | 45.1% | 28.2% | 76.5% |
| 14.0 | 43.2% | 41.9% | 75.2% |