140-149
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
26-40|L10: 1-9
Oklahoma
City Thunder
59-26|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Oklahoma City Thunder
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-16 | 0.758 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/21 | L 100-116 | |
| 3/19 |
| 47-19 |
| 0.712 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 41-25 | 0.621 | 9.0 |
| 4 | 41-25 | 0.621 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 40-26 | 0.606 | 10.0 |
| 6 | 38-28 | 0.576 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 9 | 34-32 | 0.515 | 16.0 |
| 10 | 33-33 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 11 | 28-38 | 0.424 | 22.0 |
| 12 | 26-40 | 0.394 | 24.0 |
| 13 | 23-43 | 0.348 | 27.0 |
| 14 | 22-44 | 0.333 | 28.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 17.0 |
| 3/18 | L 99-115 |
| 3/16 | L 92-97 |
| 3/15 | L 105-111 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/21 | W 114-91 | |
| 3/20 | L 90-97 | |
| 3/18 | W 111-95 | |
| 3/16 | L 105-114 | |
| 3/15 | W 103-90 |
| Category | OKC Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #388.0 ORtg | #19104.5 DRtg | OKC |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2412.6% | #2513.3% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #635.8% | #633.9% | Even |
| Category | OKC Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #11102.1 DRtg | #1881.7 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2114.0% | #2112.2% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1835.7% | #2133.4% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.0 | 43.9% | 32.8% | 81.2% | |
| 14.5 | 58.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.2 |
| 0.0% |
| 64.8% |
| 12.1 | 43.0% | 26.0% | 68.7% |
| 39.4% |
| 85.0% |
| 23.5 | 44.5% | 28.4% | 79.8% |
| 16.7 | 46.9% | 40.3% | 82.6% |