84-106
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
31-50|L10: 5-5
Oklahoma
City Thunder
65-28|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Oklahoma City Thunder
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60-22 | 0.732 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/8 | W 108-103 | |
| 1/5 |
| 57-24 |
| 0.704 |
| 2.5 |
| 3 | 57-24 | 0.704 | 2.5 |
| 4 | 56-26 | 0.683 | 4.0 |
| 5 | 55-26 | 0.679 | 4.5 |
| 6 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 13.0 |
| 7 | 45-36 | 0.556 | 14.5 |
| 8 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 15.0 |
| 9 | 42-39 | 0.519 | 17.5 |
| 10 | 40-41 | 0.494 | 19.5 |
| 11 | 33-48 | 0.407 | 26.5 |
| 12 | 31-50 | 0.383 | 28.5 |
| 13 | 28-53 | 0.346 | 31.5 |
| 14 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 35.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 19.0 |
| 1/3 | W 101-97 |
| 1/2 | L 84-106 |
| 12/29 | W 111-107 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/7 | L 99-101 | |
| 1/6 | W 104-92 | |
| 1/4 | W 109-85 | |
| 1/2 | L 93-110 | |
| 12/31 | W 114-96 |
| Category | OKC Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #389.5 ORtg | #15103.5 DRtg | OKC |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2112.5% | #216.1% | OKC |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #636.5% | #2236.9% | OKC |
| Category | OKC Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #499.9 DRtg | #2380.2 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1614.7% | #1311.9% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #534.3% | #2830.4% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.3 | 33.6% | 17.6% | 70.0% | |
| 16.3 | 50.3% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.5 |
| 0.0% |
| 69.9% |
| 12.4 | 49.0% | 26.7% | 60.2% |
| 41.4% |
| 90.0% |
| 23.2 | 43.8% | 31.8% | 76.5% |
| 14.0 | 43.6% | 42.5% | 76.2% |