119-123
FINALChicago
Bulls
31-41|L10: 5-5
Orlando
Magic
21-51|L10: 2-8
Chicago Bulls
Orlando Magic
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 49-23 | 0.681 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/4 | L 103-107 | |
| 2/2 | W 110-102 |
| 48-24 |
| 0.667 |
| 1.0 |
| 3 | 46-26 | 0.639 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 41-31 | 0.569 | 8.0 |
| 5 | 41-31 | 0.569 | 8.0 |
| 6 | 40-32 | 0.556 | 9.0 |
| 7 | 36-36 | 0.500 | 13.0 |
| 8 | 34-38 | 0.472 | 15.0 |
| 9 | 34-38 | 0.472 | 15.0 |
| 10 | 33-39 | 0.458 | 16.0 |
| 11 | 31-41 | 0.431 | 18.0 |
| 12 | 27-45 | 0.375 | 22.0 |
| 13 | 22-50 | 0.306 | 27.0 |
| 14 | 21-51 | 0.292 | 28.0 |
| 15 | 20-52 | 0.278 | 29.0 |
| 1/31 | L 122-123 |
| 1/26 | L 103-119 |
| 1/24 | L 90-101 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/3 | L 108-123 | |
| 2/1 | L 102-115 | |
| 1/30 | L 90-116 | |
| 1/28 | L 107-121 | |
| 1/26 | W 117-108 |
| Category | ORL Offense | CHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #10849.0 ORtg | #25920.2 DRtg | ORL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #29100.0% | #14100.0% | ORL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #300.0% | #140.0% | CHI |
| Category | ORL Defense | CHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #27931.3 DRtg | #24762.6 ORtg | ORL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #21100.0% | #23100.0% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #210.0% | #230.0% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.4 | - | 40.4% | - | |
| 21.5 | - | 39.8% | - | |
| 15.1 | - | 33.1% | - |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.5 |
| 42.2% |
| - |
| 19.7 | - | 37.1% | - |
| 15.6 | - | - | - |