89-102
FINALChicago
Bulls
42-40|L10: 6-4
Orlando
Magic
35-47|L10: 6-4
Chicago Bulls
Orlando Magic
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57-25 | 0.695 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/1 | L 111-129 | |
| 2/27 |
| 56-26 |
| 0.683 |
| 1.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 7 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 12.0 |
| 8 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 15.0 |
| 10 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 16.0 |
| 11 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 22.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 24.0 |
| 13 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 25.0 |
| 14 | 21-61 | 0.256 | 36.0 |
| 15 | 10-72 | 0.122 | 47.0 |
| 2/26 | L 88-103 |
| 2/24 | W 109-104 |
| 2/21 | W 126-115 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/1 | L 108-121 | |
| 2/28 | W 130-116 | |
| 2/26 | L 95-108 | |
| 2/25 | L 114-130 | |
| 2/23 | W 124-115 |
| Category | ORL Offense | CHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1686.0 ORtg | #15105.8 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1511.5% |
CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1734.6% | #1234.8% | CHI |
| Category | ORL Defense | CHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #20106.8 DRtg | #2584.7 ORtg | CHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1214.8% | #1311.1% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2136.2% | #536.8% | ORL |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.9 | 47.5% | 29.0% | 83.0% | |
| 16.5 | 47.2% | 15.3% | 74.2% | |
| 16.4 | 41.7% | 22.8% | 59.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.2 | 50.2% |
| 3.4% |
| 57.5% |
| 16.0 | 42.9% | 33.7% | 61.5% |
| 15.4 | 45.7% | 39.5% | 67.4% |