100-71
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
68-32|L10: 4-6
Orlando
Magic
21-61|L10: 2-8
Minnesota Timberwolves
Orlando Magic
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61-21 | 0.744 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/5 | L 121-125 | |
| 11/3 |
| — |
| 2 | 54-28 | 0.659 | 7.0 |
| 3 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 14.0 |
| 4 | 4-3 | 0.571 | 19.5 |
| 5 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 19.0 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 20.0 |
| 7 | 39-43 | 0.476 | 22.0 |
| 8 | 36-46 | 0.439 | 25.0 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 26.0 |
| 10 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 28.0 |
| 11 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 28.0 |
| 12 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 33.0 |
| 13 | 25-58 | 0.301 | 36.5 |
| 14 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 38.0 |
| 15 | 21-61 | 0.256 | 40.0 |
| 11/1 | W 73-56 |
| 10/31 | L 61-84 |
| 10/29 | W 95-89 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/5 | L 100-106 | |
| 11/3 | L 68-75 | |
| 11/1 | L 85-96 | |
| 10/30 | L 98-100 | |
| 10/29 | W 85-83 |
| Category | ORL Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1880.6 ORtg | #598.9 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #210.8% | #2813.8% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1634.2% | #1033.9% | MIN |
| Category | ORL Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #27109.6 DRtg | #685.0 ORtg | ORL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2714.1% | #311.2% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2938.4% | #337.2% | ORL |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.3 | 49.8% | 10.7% | 76.5% | |
| 19.6 | 48.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.0 | 40.6% |
| 35.0% |
| 72.1% |
| 17.3 | 39.4% | 31.3% | 68.0% |
| 32.5% |
| 75.7% |
| 17.0 | 44.9% | 0.0% | 75.0% |
| 11.7 | 43.3% | 6.7% | 51.0% |