92-100
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
40-42|L10: 4-6
Orlando
Magic
23-59|L10: 3-7
Minnesota Timberwolves
Orlando Magic
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56-26 | 0.683 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/4 | W 122-121 | |
| 4/2 |
| — |
| 2 | 54-28 | 0.659 | 2.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 8.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 8.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 12.0 |
| 6 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 43-39 | 0.524 | 13.0 |
| 8 | 38-44 | 0.463 | 18.0 |
| 9 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 19.0 |
| 10 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 23.0 |
| 11 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 27.0 |
| 12 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 31.0 |
| 13 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 33.0 |
| 14 | 19-63 | 0.232 | 37.0 |
| 15 | 15-67 | 0.183 | 41.0 |
| 3/31 | L 104-114 |
| 3/30 | L 99-114 |
| 3/28 | W 143-107 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/4 | L 80-91 | |
| 4/2 | L 98-119 | |
| 3/30 | L 93-98 | |
| 3/28 | W 110-105 | |
| 3/25 | W 95-85 |
| Category | ORL Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2487.5 ORtg | #10109.7 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1612.8% | #616.8% | ORL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2334.5% | #2236.8% | Even |
| Category | ORL Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #15110.9 DRtg | #1788.8 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2214.7% | #111.2% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2437.1% | #2433.9% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.1 | 45.3% | 36.8% | 84.1% | |
| 19.1 | 41.8% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.2 |
| 36.2% |
| 79.8% |
| 17.5 | 52.3% | 0.0% | 67.7% |
| 45.9% |
| 39.7% |
| 72.5% |
| 14.6 | 46.9% | 21.7% | 72.6% |
| 14.2 | 51.5% | 0.0% | 58.7% |