89-100
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
24-58|L10: 4-6
Orlando
Magic
72-34|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Orlando Magic
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66-16 | 0.805 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/1 | L 90-100 | |
| 11/29 |
| — |
| 2 | 62-20 | 0.756 | 4.0 |
| 3 | 59-23 | 0.720 | 7.0 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 19.0 |
| 5 | 43-39 | 0.524 | 23.0 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 25.0 |
| 7 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 25.0 |
| 8 | 39-43 | 0.476 | 27.0 |
| 9 | 36-46 | 0.439 | 30.0 |
| 10 | 37-49 | 0.430 | 31.0 |
| 11 | 34-48 | 0.415 | 32.0 |
| 12 | 34-48 | 0.415 | 32.0 |
| 13 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 33.0 |
| 14 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 34.0 |
| 15 | 19-63 | 0.232 | 47.0 |
| 11/28 | W 105-103 |
| 11/26 | L 102-110 |
| 11/23 | W 106-80 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/1 | L 88-107 | |
| 11/29 | W 110-96 | |
| 11/27 | W 105-90 | |
| 11/26 | W 96-94 | |
| 11/24 | W 108-101 |
| Category | ORL Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #489.9 ORtg | #24110.4 DRtg | ORL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1911.9% | #2613.2% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #837.6% | #2337.6% | ORL |
| Category | ORL Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #3100.9 DRtg | #2683.0 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2513.3% | #1411.5% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #333.5% | #2235.3% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.1 | 49.2% | 0.0% | 71.2% | |
| 16.3 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.5 | 58.0% |
| 32.3% |
| 70.5% |
| 13.3 | 41.8% | 34.1% | 57.6% |
| 0.0% |
| 61.7% |
| 18.0 | 44.0% | 39.7% | 74.4% |
| 16.6 | 42.1% | 34.1% | 73.2% |