123-107
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
30-50|L10: 2-8
Orlando
Magic
28-50|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Orlando Magic
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51-26 | 0.662 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/8 | L 110-119 | |
| 11/5 |
| — |
| 2 | 48-29 | 0.623 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 48-30 | 0.615 | 3.5 |
| 4 | 48-30 | 0.615 | 3.5 |
| 5 | 42-35 | 0.545 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 41-39 | 0.512 | 11.5 |
| 7 | 39-39 | 0.500 | 12.5 |
| 8 | 39-39 | 0.500 | 12.5 |
| 9 | 39-41 | 0.487 | 13.5 |
| 10 | 35-44 | 0.443 | 17.0 |
| 11 | 30-49 | 0.380 | 22.0 |
| 12 | 28-50 | 0.359 | 23.5 |
| 13 | 28-50 | 0.359 | 23.5 |
| 14 | 50-103 | 0.327 | 39.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 12.5 |
| 11/1 | W 116-80 |
| 10/29 | L 103-106 |
| 10/26 | L 98-102 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/7 | L 80-112 | |
| 11/5 | W 88-86 | |
| 11/1 | W 103-101 | |
| 10/29 | L 99-105 | |
| 10/28 | L 82-108 |
| Category | ORL Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2884.6 ORtg | #27109.7 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1311.0% |
| Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2832.5% | #2436.8% | MIN |
| Category | ORL Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #22108.7 DRtg | #1888.1 ORtg | ORL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2212.6% | #1611.2% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2236.8% | #2234.4% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.0 | 54.3% | 35.0% | 76.3% | |
| 23.5 | 44.4% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.7 |
| 73.6% |
| 19.0 | 44.7% | 34.9% | 61.9% |
| 42.5% |
| 35.1% |
| 71.8% |
| 15.2 | 48.4% | 39.2% | 48.9% |
| 14.8 | 47.0% | 16.7% | 42.4% |