124-127
FINALSan
Antonio Spurs
42-43|L10: 5-5
Portland
Trail Blazers
39-46|L10: 5-5
San Antonio Spurs
Portland Trail Blazers
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60-22 | 0.732 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/2 | L 107-117 | |
| 10/31 |
| 55-26 |
| 0.679 |
| 4.5 |
| 3 | 55-27 | 0.671 | 5.0 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 13.0 |
| 5 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 19.0 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 19.0 |
| 7 | 38-44 | 0.463 | 22.0 |
| 8 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 25.0 |
| 9 | 30-51 | 0.370 | 29.5 |
| 10 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 36.0 |
| 11 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 36.0 |
| 10/30 | L 109-142 |
| 10/27 | W 128-121 |
| 10/26 | W 129-113 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/2 | W 123-102 | |
| 10/31 | L 106-111 | |
| 10/28 | L 88-89 | |
| 10/26 | W 95-93 | |
| 10/24 | W 88-87 |
| Category | POR Offense | SAS Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #21552.9 ORtg | #15850.6 DRtg | SAS |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #21100.0% | #9100.0% | POR |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #220.0% | #80.0% | SAS |
| Category | POR Defense | SAS Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #7596.5 DRtg | #8838.8 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #21100.0% | #8100.0% | SAS |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #220.0% | #80.0% | POR |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33.1 | - | - | - | |
Larry Kenon | 19.6 | - | - | - |
| 17.6 | - | - | - |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Calvin Natt | 20.0 |
| - |
| - |
| - |
Billy Ray Bates | 16.6 | - | - | - |
Tom Owens | 16.2 | - | - | - |