111-125
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
50-35|L10: 4-6
Sacramento
Kings
71-27|L10: 6-4
Minnesota Timberwolves
Sacramento Kings
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61-21 | 0.744 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/27 | W 94-91 | |
| 12/23 | W 95-74 |
| 58-24 |
| 0.707 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 58-24 | 0.707 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 57-25 | 0.695 | 4.0 |
| 5 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 11.0 |
| 6 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 16.0 |
| 8 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 17.0 |
| 9 | 39-43 | 0.476 | 22.0 |
| 10 | 36-46 | 0.439 | 25.0 |
| 11 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 33.0 |
| 12 | 27-55 | 0.329 | 34.0 |
| 13 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 38.0 |
| 14 | 21-61 | 0.256 | 40.0 |
| 12/22 | W 94-89 |
| 12/20 | L 112-117 |
| 12/19 | L 103-107 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/27 | W 89-74 | |
| 12/24 | W 133-101 | |
| 12/23 | L 85-101 | |
| 12/20 | L 92-104 | |
| 12/19 | W 102-98 |
| Category | SAC Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #585.6 ORtg | #13106.7 DRtg | SAC |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #511.1% | #2613.8% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #935.9% | #2737.7% | SAC |
| Category | SAC Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #3102.3 DRtg | #1084.0 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1615.3% | #411.1% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #232.5% | #337.9% | Even |
| 21.3 | 47.8% | 21.8% | 65.8% | |
| 18.7 | 50.4% | 43.4% | 63.3% | |
| 12.9 | 41.2% | 40.4% | 66.8% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.3 | 49.8% | 7.5% | 71.5% | |
Peja Stojaković | 21.1 | - | - | - |
| 21.0 | 46.9% | 39.7% | 71.7% |