112-100
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
44-38|L10: 6-4
Sacramento
Kings
51-36|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Sacramento Kings
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62-20 | 0.756 | — | |
| 2 | 59-23 | 0.720 | 3.0 | |
| 3 | 58-24 | 0.707 | 4.0 | |
| 4 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 10.0 | |
| 5 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 11.0 | |
| 6 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 12.0 | |
| 7 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 13.0 | |
| 8 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 17.0 | |
| 9 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 18.0 | |
| 10 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 25.0 | |
| 11 | 34-48 | 0.415 | 28.0 | |
| 12 | 34-48 | 0.415 | 28.0 | |
| 13 | 27-55 | 0.329 | 35.0 | |
| 14 | 26-56 | 0.317 | 36.0 | |
| 15 | 18-64 | 0.220 | 44.0 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/1 | L 98-107 | |
| 3/31 | W 105-96 | |
| 3/27 | W 89-85 | |
| 3/26 | W 96-75 | |
| 3/23 | W 107-102 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/1 | W 128-109 | |
| 3/30 | L 82-99 | |
| 3/28 | W 118-109 | |
| 3/26 | L 99-113 | |
| 3/24 | W 109-101 |
| Category | SAC Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #687.4 ORtg | #12105.9 DRtg | SAC |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #110.5% | #2912.3% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #337.2% | #2436.5% | SAC |
| Category | SAC Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #25108.8 DRtg | #1385.0 ORtg | SAC |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1915.1% | #811.2% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1135.2% | #2034.7% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.2 | 51.2% | 7.3% | 79.3% | |
| 15.5 | 50.7% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.3 | 45.4% |
| 31.8% |
| 73.6% |
| 13.5 | 44.0% | 16.4% | 62.3% |
| 23.8% |
| 71.8% |
Peja Stojaković | 20.3 | - | - | - |
| 20.1 | 43.9% | 40.1% | 79.2% |