110-101
FINALUtah
Jazz
51-37|L10: 5-5
Sacramento
Kings
30-52|L10: 5-5
Utah Jazz
Sacramento Kings
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64-18 | 0.780 | — | |
| 2 | 56-26 | 0.683 | 8.0 | |
| 3 | 53-29 | 0.646 | 11.0 | |
| 4 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 12.0 | |
| 5 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 15.0 | |
| 6 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 16.0 | |
| 7 | 46-36 | 0.561 | 18.0 | |
| 8 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 22.0 | |
| 9 | 36-46 | 0.439 | 28.0 | |
| 10 | 34-48 | 0.415 | 30.0 | |
| 11 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 31.0 | |
| 12 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 34.0 | |
| 13 | 27-55 | 0.329 | 37.0 | |
| 14 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 40.0 | |
| 15 | 20-62 | 0.244 | 44.0 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/20 | W 107-86 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/20 | W 124-121 |
| Category | SAC Offense | UTA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1897.4 ORtg | #9114.9 DRtg | UTA |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2011.9% | #3011.9% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2134.7% | #1735.5% | UTA |
| Category | SAC Defense | UTA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #27121.7 DRtg | #1099.1 ORtg | SAC |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2213.2% | #1411.5% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2937.4% | #1535.7% | SAC |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 25.8 | 43.5% | 8.4% | 73.8% |
| 18.1 | 45.8% | 36.2% | 72.7% |
| 16.1 | 45.8% | 9.4% | 64.8% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 | 47.9% | 10.6% | 78.9% | |
| 18.9 | 56.5% | 10.2% | 54.7% | |
| 16.4 | 49.7% | 15.0% | 74.3% |