111-133
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
15-66|L10: 1-9
San
Antonio Spurs
54-38|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
San Antonio Spurs
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56-25 | 0.691 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/11 | L 86-114 | |
| 4/9 |
| 55-27 |
| 0.671 |
| 1.5 |
| 3 | 53-28 | 0.654 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 53-29 | 0.646 | 3.5 |
| 5 | 52-29 | 0.642 | 4.0 |
| 6 | 50-31 | 0.617 | 6.0 |
| 7 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 6.5 |
| 8 | 49-32 | 0.605 | 7.0 |
| 9 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 14.5 |
| 10 | 40-41 | 0.494 | 16.0 |
| 11 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 27.5 |
| 12 | 26-56 | 0.317 | 30.5 |
| 13 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 31.5 |
| 14 | 15-66 | 0.185 | 41.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 15.5 |
| 4/7 | L 107-116 |
| 4/4 | L 108-116 |
| 4/3 | L 84-97 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/10 | W 104-85 | |
| 4/9 | L 99-107 | |
| 4/7 | L 101-112 | |
| 4/6 | W 95-86 | |
| 4/4 | W 100-81 |
| Category | SAS Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1087.4 ORtg | #27110.5 DRtg | SAS |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #911.3% | #2013.6% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1135.3% | #2236.3% | SAS |
| Category | SAS Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #9103.2 DRtg | #2780.6 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2313.1% | #2612.8% | SAS |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1135.0% | #2034.3% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 17.1 | 49.6% | 0.0% | 58.8% | |
| 14.0 | 44.2% | 24.7% | 75.6% | |
| 13.5 | 41.2% | 31.4% | 72.2% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.0 | 52.4% | 2.8% | 62.5% | |
| 16.8 | 42.5% | 36.1% | 79.3% | |
| 16.2 | 48.3% | 10.3% | 64.2% |