91-106
FINALUtah
Jazz
36-34|L10: 5-5
San
Antonio Spurs
60-20|L10: 6-4
Utah Jazz
San Antonio Spurs
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-16 | 0.758 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/26 | W 96-94 | |
| 4/24 |
| 47-19 |
| 0.712 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 41-25 | 0.621 | 9.0 |
| 4 | 41-25 | 0.621 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 40-26 | 0.606 | 10.0 |
| 6 | 38-28 | 0.576 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 9 | 34-32 | 0.515 | 16.0 |
| 10 | 33-33 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 11 | 28-38 | 0.424 | 22.0 |
| 12 | 26-40 | 0.394 | 24.0 |
| 13 | 23-43 | 0.348 | 27.0 |
| 14 | 22-44 | 0.333 | 28.0 |
| 15 | 21-45 | 0.318 | 29.0 |
| 4/21 | W 117-107 |
| 4/18 | W 112-91 |
| 4/16 | W 12-10 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/26 | W 107-101 | |
| 4/25 | W 110-106 | |
| 4/23 | W 124-89 | |
| 4/22 | W 114-98 | |
| 4/20 | W 121-97 |
| Category | SAS Offense | UTA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #390.7 ORtg | #20104.8 DRtg | SAS |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1411.8% | #2014.6% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #140.2% | #1234.5% | SAS |
| Category | SAS Defense | UTA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #11103.1 DRtg | #2381.2 ORtg | UTA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2513.8% | #210.9% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2235.7% | #2431.9% | Even |
| 19.1 | 48.1% | 1.7% | 61.8% |
| 16.3 | 48.9% | 6.5% | 68.4% |
| 11.6 | 42.0% | 27.8% | 71.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.6 | 46.1% | 14.1% | 74.2% | |
| 15.8 | 48.1% | 0.0% | 66.0% | |
Manu Ginóbili | 13.4 | - | - | - |