96-105
FINALChicago
Bulls
42-40|L10: 6-4
Utah
Jazz
40-42|L10: 5-5
Chicago Bulls
Utah Jazz
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57-25 | 0.695 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/31 | L 93-120 | |
| 1/28 |
| — |
| 2 | 56-26 | 0.683 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 7 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 12.0 |
| 8 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 15.0 |
| 10 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 16.0 |
| 11 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 22.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 24.0 |
| 13 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 25.0 |
| 14 | 21-61 | 0.256 | 36.0 |
| 15 | 10-72 | 0.122 | 47.0 |
| 1/25 | L 84-89 |
| 1/23 | W 96-83 |
| 1/22 | L 101-110 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/29 | W 103-90 | |
| 1/27 | W 102-73 | |
| 1/25 | L 92-95 | |
| 1/22 | W 108-86 | |
| 1/20 | L 111-118 |
| Category | UTA Offense | CHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2085.6 ORtg | #15105.8 DRtg | CHI |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2312.4% | #2911.5% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1135.5% | #1234.8% | Even |
| Category | UTA Defense | CHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #8103.4 DRtg | #2584.7 ORtg | CHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1514.3% | #1311.1% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1735.5% | #536.8% | UTA |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.9 | 47.5% | 29.0% | 83.0% | |
| 16.5 | 47.2% | 15.3% | 74.2% | |
| 16.4 | 41.7% | 22.8% | 59.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.7 |
| 43.6% |
| 34.9% |
| 83.3% |
| 16.4 | 51.5% | 0.0% | 68.2% |
| 14.5 | 42.0% | 34.9% | 64.6% |