108-106
FINALLos
Angeles Lakers
61-40|L10: 4-6
Utah
Jazz
23-63|L10: 1-9
Los Angeles Lakers
Utah Jazz
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68-20 | 0.773 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/19 | W 140-126 | |
| 11/16 | W 119-95 |
| 66-21 |
| 0.759 |
| 1.5 |
| 3 | 57-30 | 0.655 | 10.5 |
| 4 | 56-30 | 0.651 | 11.0 |
| 5 | 54-34 | 0.614 | 14.0 |
| 6 | 50-37 | 0.575 | 17.5 |
| 7 | 48-38 | 0.558 | 19.0 |
| 8 | 44-41 | 0.518 | 22.5 |
| 9 | 43-43 | 0.500 | 24.0 |
| 10 | 40-47 | 0.460 | 27.5 |
| 11 | 29-57 | 0.337 | 38.0 |
| 12 | 26-58 | 0.310 | 40.0 |
| 13 | 26-61 | 0.299 | 41.5 |
| 14 | 23-63 | 0.267 | 44.0 |
| 15 | 23-63 | 0.267 | 44.0 |
| 11/15 | W 118-104 |
| 11/13 | L 92-121 |
| 11/11 | W 121-111 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/22 | L 112-144 | |
| 11/19 | L 126-140 | |
| 11/17 | W 150-147 | |
| 11/14 | L 122-132 | |
| 11/12 | W 152-128 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33.3 | 47.2% | 36.2% | 76.9% | |
| 25.0 | 52.7% | 0.0% | 62.3% | |
| 24.8 | 44.4% | 23.6% | 64.2% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.1 | 47.7% |
| 35.5% |
| 86.4% |
| 23.0 | 45.1% | 34.6% | 85.1% |
| 22.3 | 50.4% | 34.0% | 90.5% |
| Category | UTA Offense | LAL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1691.6 ORtg | #15112.2 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1911.7% | #1613.9% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2334.8% | #1235.1% | LAL |
| Category | UTA Defense | LAL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #30120.2 DRtg | #495.4 ORtg | UTA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2013.4% | #2411.9% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2637.1% | #1835.5% | UTA |