113-120
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
30-50|L10: 2-8
Utah
Jazz
52-36|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Utah Jazz
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63-15 | 0.808 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/6 | L 98-105 | |
| 4/4 |
| 58-20 |
| 0.744 |
| 5.0 |
| 3 | 53-25 | 0.679 | 10.0 |
| 4 | 48-30 | 0.615 | 15.0 |
| 5 | 48-31 | 0.608 | 15.5 |
| 6 | 46-31 | 0.597 | 16.5 |
| 7 | 40-38 | 0.513 | 23.0 |
| 8 | 40-41 | 0.494 | 24.5 |
| 9 | 38-41 | 0.481 | 25.5 |
| 10 | 32-46 | 0.410 | 31.0 |
| 11 | 32-46 | 0.410 | 31.0 |
| 12 | 32-47 | 0.405 | 31.5 |
| 13 | 30-50 | 0.375 | 34.0 |
| 14 | 25-54 | 0.316 | 38.5 |
| 15 | 24-56 | 0.300 | 40.0 |
| 4/3 | W 110-109 |
| 4/1 | L 117-123 |
| 3/28 | W 115-114 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/4 | W 106-87 | |
| 3/27 | W 108-100 | |
| 3/25 | L 95-108 | |
| 3/22 | W 108-101 | |
| 3/20 | L 100-107 |
| Category | UTA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1289.9 ORtg | #27109.7 DRtg | UTA |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2011.5% | #1114.0% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #836.8% | #2436.8% | UTA |
| Category | UTA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #4104.5 DRtg | #1888.1 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2812.2% | #1611.2% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1936.3% | #2234.4% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 25.0 | 54.3% | 35.0% | 76.3% | |
| 23.5 | 44.4% | 33.7% | 73.6% | |
| 19.0 | 44.7% | 34.9% | 61.9% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.3 | 46.3% | 40.4% | 81.8% | |
| 16.7 | 47.6% | 40.6% | 67.4% | |
| 13.8 | 65.9% | 0.0% | 61.7% |