118-108
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
39-42|L10: 5-5
Utah
Jazz
34-40|L10: 2-8
Minnesota Timberwolves
Utah Jazz
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48-25 | 0.658 | — | |
| 2 | 45-30 | 0.600 | 4.0 | |
| 3 | 44-31 | 0.587 | 5.0 | |
| 4 | 42-34 | 0.553 | 7.5 | |
| 5 | 39-34 | 0.534 | 9.0 | |
| 6 | 38-34 | 0.528 | 9.5 | |
| 7 | 37-36 | 0.507 | 11.0 | |
| 8 | 37-36 | 0.507 | 11.0 | |
| 9 | 37-37 | 0.500 | 11.5 | |
| 10 | 36-38 | 0.486 | 12.5 | |
| 11 | 36-40 | 0.474 | 13.5 | |
| 12 | 34-40 | 0.459 | 14.5 | |
| 13 | 27-45 | 0.375 | 20.5 | |
| 14 | 21-53 | 0.284 | 27.5 | |
| 15 | 20-56 | 0.263 | 29.5 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/7 | W 121-115 | |
| 12/3 | L 128-135 | |
| 11/30 | W 109-101 | |
| 11/28 | L 127-142 | |
| 11/27 | L 114-137 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/7 | W 124-123 | |
| 12/3 | L 111-116 | |
| 12/2 | W 139-119 | |
| 11/30 | W 125-112 | |
| 11/28 | L 107-114 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.2 | 45.5% | 35.8% | 70.9% | |
| 20.9 | 51.8% | 39.0% | 74.6% | |
| 18.1 | 46.7% | 37.5% | 61.7% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.9 | 50.1% | 38.8% | 80.0% | |
| 21.2 | 44.6% | 32.7% | 78.8% | |
| 14.4 | 50.4% | 30.5% | 75.1% |
| Category | UTA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2092.5 ORtg | #13112.2 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2511.7% | #514.1% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1835.5% | #2437.1% | UTA |
| Category | UTA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #21114.2 DRtg | #795.8 ORtg | UTA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2711.7% | #2912.3% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1735.9% | #737.1% | UTA |