102-106
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
36-45|L10: 4-6
Utah
Jazz
51-35|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Utah Jazz
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56-25 | 0.691 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/24 | W 120-105 | |
| 1/22 |
| 53-28 |
| 0.654 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 53-29 | 0.646 | 3.5 |
| 4 | 52-29 | 0.642 | 4.0 |
| 5 | 50-31 | 0.617 | 6.0 |
| 6 | 48-33 | 0.593 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 8.5 |
| 8 | 47-34 | 0.580 | 9.0 |
| 9 | 39-43 | 0.476 | 17.5 |
| 10 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 19.5 |
| 11 | 36-45 | 0.444 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 33-48 | 0.407 | 23.0 |
| 13 | 33-48 | 0.407 | 23.0 |
| 14 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 23.5 |
| 15 | 19-63 | 0.232 | 37.5 |
| 1/20 | W 116-114 |
| 1/18 | L 113-116 |
| 1/15 | L 107-149 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/23 | W 114-108 | |
| 1/21 | L 104-109 | |
| 1/18 | W 115-99 | |
| 1/16 | W 129-109 | |
| 1/14 | W 100-94 |
| Category | UTA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1190.8 ORtg | #21110.7 DRtg | UTA |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2612.0% | #1013.8% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1535.2% | #2837.9% | UTA |
| Category | UTA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #2103.9 DRtg | #1789.2 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1413.1% | #39.9% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1435.5% | #1635.1% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.5 | 51.8% | 41.9% | 82.6% | |
| 21.4 | 47.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.6 | 42.5% |
| 72.2% |
| 18.2 | 46.8% | 24.5% | 67.8% |
| 35.1% |
| 73.1% |
| 15.8 | 66.7% | 0.0% | 63.5% |
| 13.1 | 38.6% | 26.5% | 71.2% |