88-93
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
68-32|L10: 4-6
Utah
Jazz
42-40|L10: 5-5
Minnesota Timberwolves
Utah Jazz
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58-24 | 0.707 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/1 | W 73-56 | |
| 10/31 |
| 57-25 |
| 0.695 |
| 1.0 |
| 3 | 56-26 | 0.683 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 55-27 | 0.671 | 3.0 |
| 5 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 6.0 |
| 6 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 13.0 |
| 8 | 43-39 | 0.524 | 15.0 |
| 9 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 16.0 |
| 10 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 11 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 12 | 38-45 | 0.458 | 20.5 |
| 13 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 21.0 |
| 14 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 29.0 |
| 15 | 28-55 | 0.337 | 30.5 |
| 10/29 | W 95-89 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/1 | L 102-127 | |
| 10/29 | W 99-92 |
| Category | UTA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2777.2 ORtg | #598.9 DRtg | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2213.2% | #2813.8% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2631.9% | #1033.9% | MIN |
| Category | UTA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #12102.4 DRtg | #685.0 ORtg | UTA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #716.9% | #311.2% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1234.0% | #337.2% | UTA |
| 24.3 | 49.8% | 10.7% | 76.5% | |
| 19.6 | 48.0% | 35.0% | 72.1% | |
| 17.3 | 39.4% | 31.3% | 68.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.5 | 44.8% | 31.2% | 75.8% | |
| 16.2 | 47.8% | 16.7% | 59.5% | |
| 14.2 | 41.9% | 32.6% | 54.0% |