105-111
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
26-40|L10: 1-9
Utah
Jazz
36-34|L10: 5-5
Minnesota Timberwolves
Utah Jazz
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-16 | 0.758 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/12 | W 127-124 | |
| 3/10 |
| 47-19 |
| 0.712 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 41-25 | 0.621 | 9.0 |
| 4 | 41-25 | 0.621 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 40-26 | 0.606 | 10.0 |
| 6 | 38-28 | 0.576 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 9 | 34-32 | 0.515 | 16.0 |
| 10 | 33-33 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 11 | 28-38 | 0.424 | 22.0 |
| 12 | 26-40 | 0.394 | 24.0 |
| 13 | 23-43 | 0.348 | 27.0 |
| 14 | 22-44 | 0.333 | 28.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 17.0 |
| 3/9 | L 102-105 |
| 3/7 | W 106-94 |
| 3/5 | W 95-94 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/14 | L 111-120 | |
| 3/12 | W 105-90 | |
| 3/10 | L 97-111 | |
| 3/9 | L 91-104 | |
| 3/7 | W 99-93 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.0 | 43.9% | 32.8% | 81.2% | |
| 14.5 | 58.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.1 |
| 0.0% |
| 64.8% |
| 12.1 | 43.0% | 26.0% | 68.7% |
| 48.8% |
| 1.5% |
| 62.1% |
| 16.3 | 48.7% | 7.5% | 67.5% |
| 11.6 | 42.1% | 27.6% | 71.7% |
| Category | UTA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2181.2 ORtg | #19104.5 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #210.9% |
MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2431.9% | #633.9% | MIN |
| Category | UTA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #20104.8 DRtg | #1881.7 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1814.6% | #2112.2% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1034.5% | #2133.4% | MIN |