143-118
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
44-45|L10: 5-5
Utah
Jazz
37-45|L10: 2-8
Minnesota Timberwolves
Utah Jazz
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/7 | L 112-146 | |
| 2/5 |
| 51-31 |
| 0.622 |
| 2.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 5.0 |
| 4 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 8.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 7 | 43-39 | 0.524 | 10.0 |
| 8 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 11.0 |
| 9 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 11.0 |
| 10 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 11 | 38-44 | 0.463 | 15.0 |
| 12 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 16.0 |
| 13 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 14 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 31.0 |
| 15 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 31.0 |
| 2/3 | L 120-127 |
| 2/1 | W 119-114 |
| 1/30 | L 111-118 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/6 | L 111-124 | |
| 2/3 | L 108-115 | |
| 2/1 | W 131-128 | |
| 1/28 | W 108-100 | |
| 1/25 | L 124-134 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.8 | 45.7% | 34.2% | 72.9% | |
| 20.7 | 49.2% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.6 | 50.4% |
| 65.4% |
| 17.9 | 47.4% | 41.2% | 64.3% |
| 39.1% |
| 81.4% |
| 20.8 | 44.1% | 33.0% | 82.9% |
| 14.6 | 49.6% | 34.0% | 73.1% |
| Category | UTA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #19101.2 ORtg | #11121.3 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2512.9% | #815.4% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1835.5% | #2537.1% | UTA |
| Category | UTA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #22125.4 DRtg | #12103.9 ORtg | UTA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2912.9% | #2913.4% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1835.9% | #737.1% | UTA |