101-68
FINALChicago
Bulls
54-37|L10: 6-4
Washington
Wizards
41-45|L10: 2-8
Chicago Bulls
Washington Wizards
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/13 | W 100-81 | |
| 4/10 |
| 50-32 |
| 0.610 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 48-33 | 0.593 | 4.5 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 6.0 |
| 5 | 44-37 | 0.543 | 8.5 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 8 | 108-131 | 0.452 | 23.5 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 23.0 |
| 13 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 25.0 |
| 14 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 29.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 12.0 |
| 4/8 | L 89-103 |
| 4/6 | W 105-74 |
| 4/4 | W 106-88 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/13 | W 98-85 | |
| 4/11 | L 82-85 | |
| 4/10 | L 92-96 | |
| 4/7 | L 114-120 | |
| 4/6 | L 94-99 |
| Category | WAS Offense | CHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #985.5 ORtg | #298.4 DRtg | CHI |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #210.9% | #217.1% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2234.6% | #735.1% | CHI |
| Category | WAS Defense | CHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #25108.6 DRtg | #2382.0 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1215.5% | #1912.8% | WAS |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2637.0% | #338.1% | WAS |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.4 | 44.1% | 37.4% | 79.4% | |
| 19.2 | 51.2% | 1.1% | 74.6% | |
| 16.0 | 43.1% | 39.8% | 64.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.8 |
| 41.2% |
| 35.5% |
| 81.5% |
| 20.5 | 43.7% | 32.6% | 63.2% |
| 19.1 | 45.3% | 17.2% | 76.1% |