95-109
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
16-66|L10: 0-10
Washington
Wizards
52-40|L10: 6-4
Minnesota Timberwolves
Washington Wizards
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60-22 | 0.732 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/14 | L 94-100 | |
| 12/12 |
| — |
| 2 | 53-29 | 0.646 | 7.0 |
| 3 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 10.0 |
| 4 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 11.0 |
| 5 | 46-36 | 0.561 | 14.0 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 19.0 |
| 7 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 20.0 |
| 8 | 38-44 | 0.463 | 22.0 |
| 9 | 38-44 | 0.463 | 22.0 |
| 10 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 23.0 |
| 11 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 27.0 |
| 12 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 28.0 |
| 13 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 35.0 |
| 14 | 18-64 | 0.220 | 42.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 43.0 |
| 12/10 | W 90-82 |
| 12/8 | L 86-102 |
| 12/6 | L 101-123 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/14 | W 93-84 | |
| 12/12 | W 104-96 | |
| 12/10 | W 91-89 | |
| 12/8 | W 133-132 | |
| 12/7 | L 93-101 |
| Category | WAS Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1488.6 ORtg | #28115.5 DRtg | WAS |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2112.8% | #1015.9% | WAS |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #336.7% | #2936.9% | WAS |
| Category | WAS Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #5105.3 DRtg | #2785.1 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2014.4% | #1912.5% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1134.2% | #2632.4% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.0 | 41.0% | 38.2% | 83.3% | |
| 16.9 | 42.5% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.5 | 44.0% |
| 20.0% |
| 69.1% |
| 14.3 | 45.9% | 23.9% | 51.7% |
| 21.9% |
| 67.0% |
| 16.4 | 41.5% | 41.3% | 56.8% |
| 12.2 | 56.2% | 0.0% | 47.4% |