112-119
FINALCleveland
Cavaliers
15-15|L10: 4-6
Chicago
Bulls
6-7|L10: 4-6
Cleveland Cavaliers
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19-5 | 0.792 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/7 | L 117-118 |
| 16-6 |
| 0.727 |
| 2.0 |
| 3 | 15-10 | 0.600 | 4.5 |
| 4 | 15-10 | 0.600 | 4.5 |
| 5 | 14-10 | 0.583 | 5.0 |
| 6 | 15-11 | 0.577 | 5.0 |
| 7 | 13-11 | 0.542 | 6.0 |
| 8 | 14-12 | 0.538 | 6.0 |
| 9 | 14-12 | 0.538 | 6.0 |
| 10 | 10-16 | 0.385 | 10.0 |
| 11 | 3-5 | 0.375 | 8.0 |
| 12 | 7-18 | 0.280 | 12.5 |
| 13 | 7-18 | 0.280 | 12.5 |
| 14 | 5-20 | 0.200 | 14.5 |
| 15 | 4-19 | 0.174 | 14.5 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/7 | W 118-117 |
| Category | CHI Offense | CLE Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2888.4 ORtg | #9110.3 DRtg | CLE |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2913.1% | #416.2% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #3031.7% | #2036.4% | CLE |
| Category | CHI Defense | CLE Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #13111.3 DRtg | #1591.2 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1414.3% | #310.5% | CLE |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2537.1% | #2534.0% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 29.0 | 50.4% | 37.6% | 78.4% |
| 18.3 | 48.8% | 34.2% | 64.6% |
| 15.5 | 34.9% | 30.1% | 78.5% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.5 | 44.9% | 30.0% | 71.4% | |
| 15.3 | 53.5% | 25.8% | 66.7% | |
| 15.3 | 37.6% | 15.4% | 59.6% |