94-87
FINALOrlando
Magic
40-46|L10: 5-5
Chicago
Bulls
55-37|L10: 6-4
Orlando Magic
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/25 | L 93-97 | |
| 2/23 |
| 50-32 |
| 0.610 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 6.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 8 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 35-51 | 0.407 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 13 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 23.0 |
| 14 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 25.0 |
| 15 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 29.0 |
| 2/21 | L 88-110 |
| 2/20 | L 94-100 |
| 2/14 | W 103-91 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/25 | L 93-95 | |
| 2/23 | W 105-90 | |
| 2/22 | W 84-78 | |
| 2/20 | W 106-81 | |
| 2/14 | L 85-100 |
| Category | CHI Offense | ORL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2183.0 ORtg | #8103.6 DRtg | ORL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2012.9% | #1615.4% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #338.1% | #1735.7% | CHI |
| Category | CHI Defense | ORL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #299.0 DRtg | #2282.8 ORtg | ORL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #417.3% | #2814.1% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #935.1% | #1235.3% | ORL |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.5 | 60.6% | 1.3% | 57.1% | |
| 14.4 | 50.5% | 2.3% | 66.1% | |
| 13.3 | 41.0% | 34.7% | 56.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.3 |
| 43.8% |
| 36.4% |
| 80.1% |
| 19.2 | 51.1% | 1.2% | 76.3% |
| 16.1 | 43.0% | 39.3% | 63.9% |