99-104
FINALPhiladelphia
76ers
47-40|L10: 5-5
Chicago
Bulls
40-45|L10: 3-7
Philadelphia 76ers
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 59-23 | 0.720 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/4 | W 121-95 | |
| 2/3 |
| 57-25 |
| 0.695 |
| 2.0 |
| 3 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 7.0 |
| 4 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 14.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 17.0 |
| 7 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 18.0 |
| 8 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 19.0 |
| 9 | 31-51 | 0.378 | 28.0 |
| 10 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 35.0 |
| 11 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 35.0 |
| 1/31 | L 105-106 |
| 1/30 | W 121-112 |
| 1/28 | W 109-107 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/5 | L 105-120 | |
| 2/3 | W 98-91 | |
| 2/1 | L 92-94 | |
| 1/30 | L 112-121 | |
| 1/28 | L 103-132 |
| Category | CHI Offense | PHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #7703.9 ORtg | #11654.6 DRtg | CHI |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2100.0% | #14100.0% | PHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #20.0% | #140.0% | CHI |
| Category | CHI Defense | PHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #17688.6 DRtg | #21593.7 ORtg | PHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2100.0% | #14100.0% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #20.0% | #140.0% | PHI |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.1 | - | - | - | |
| 16.9 | - | - | - | |
| 16.2 | - | - | - |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37.0 | - |
| - |
| - |
| 14.7 | - | - | - |
John Paxson | 11.2 | - | - | - |