100-89
FINALPortland
Trail Blazers
28-38|L10: 1-9
Chicago
Bulls
52-20|L10: 5-5
Portland Trail Blazers
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-16 | 0.758 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/14 | L 79-121 | |
| 3/13 |
| — |
| 2 | 46-20 | 0.697 | 4.0 |
| 3 | 42-24 | 0.636 | 8.0 |
| 4 | 40-26 | 0.606 | 10.0 |
| 5 | 39-27 | 0.591 | 11.0 |
| 6 | 37-29 | 0.561 | 13.0 |
| 7 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 35-31 | 0.530 | 15.0 |
| 9 | 31-35 | 0.470 | 19.0 |
| 10 | 25-41 | 0.379 | 25.0 |
| 11 | 23-43 | 0.348 | 27.0 |
| 12 | 22-44 | 0.333 | 28.0 |
| 13 | 21-45 | 0.318 | 29.0 |
| 14 | 20-46 | 0.303 | 30.0 |
| 15 | 8-60 | 0.118 | 43.0 |
| 3/10 | W 110-99 |
| 3/9 | L 86-104 |
| 3/7 | L 94-106 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/14 | W 106-102 | |
| 3/12 | W 104-99 | |
| 3/10 | W 111-97 | |
| 3/8 | L 94-99 | |
| 3/7 | W 106-104 |
| Category | CHI Offense | POR Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2579.7 ORtg | #24105.9 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #811.6% |
POR |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #337.4% | #2637.0% | CHI |
| Category | CHI Defense | POR Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #196.7 DRtg | #1582.8 ORtg | POR |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2813.3% | #1011.7% | POR |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #432.1% | #1834.3% | POR |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.0 | 51.3% | 4.1% | 77.4% | |
| 15.1 | 53.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.9 |
| 0.0% |
| 50.9% |
J.J. Hickson | 15.1 | - | - | - |
| 42.8% |
| 28.8% |
| 71.8% |
| 15.2 | 40.6% | 33.0% | 53.0% |
| 14.9 | 51.0% | 0.0% | 50.3% |