98-105
FINALOrlando
Magic
36-46|L10: 2-8
Los
Angeles Lakers
34-48|L10: 1-9
Orlando Magic
Los Angeles Lakers
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 59-23 | 0.720 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/10 | W 113-109 | |
| 12/8 |
| — |
| 2 | 54-28 | 0.659 | 5.0 |
| 3 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 12.0 |
| 4 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 14.0 |
| 5 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 14.0 |
| 6 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 15.0 |
| 7 | 44-39 | 0.530 | 15.5 |
| 8 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 17.0 |
| 9 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 17.0 |
| 10 | 36-46 | 0.439 | 23.0 |
| 11 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 26.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 26.0 |
| 13 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 29.0 |
| 14 | 20-67 | 0.230 | 41.5 |
| 15 | 13-69 | 0.159 | 46.0 |
| 12/6 | L 102-115 |
| 12/4 | W 96-91 |
| 12/3 | W 104-98 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/11 | W 89-87 | |
| 12/8 | L 110-113 | |
| 12/3 | W 97-88 | |
| 12/1 | L 84-92 | |
| 11/30 | W 95-90 |
| Category | LAL Offense | ORL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1684.3 ORtg | #15106.4 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1311.5% |
ORL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1435.5% | #734.3% | ORL |
| Category | LAL Defense | ORL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #28110.5 DRtg | #2282.0 ORtg | LAL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #3012.2% | #2412.9% | ORL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2136.3% | #1635.0% | LAL |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 21.3 | 42.4% | 24.1% | 79.5% |
| 19.7 | 52.1% | 3.3% | 69.8% |
| 16.0 | 42.9% | 45.5% | 61.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.6 | 43.8% | 27.9% | 79.2% | |
| 15.5 | 42.4% | 16.2% | 72.9% | |
| 15.2 | 48.1% | 28.6% | 63.7% |