105-99
FINALBoston
Celtics
48-44|L10: 4-6
Minnesota
Timberwolves
53-35|L10: 5-5
Boston Celtics
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-32 | 0.610 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/8 | W 98-95 | |
| 11/7 | W 91-69 |
| — |
| 2 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 6.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 8 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 15.0 |
| 11 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 25.0 |
| 13 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 26.0 |
| 14 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 33.0 |
| 11/3 | W 117-107 |
| 11/1 | L 69-114 |
| 10/31 | L 96-99 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/8 | W 114-110 | |
| 11/6 | W 90-86 | |
| 11/5 | L 82-106 | |
| 11/3 | L 80-87 | |
| 11/2 | W 111-105 |
| Category | MIN Offense | BOS Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #884.4 ORtg | #20111.7 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #511.5% | #318.3% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #635.9% | #533.2% | Even |
| Category | MIN Defense | BOS Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #8106.0 DRtg | #2081.6 ORtg | BOS |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2914.1% | #1211.9% | BOS |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1534.9% | #1933.6% | BOS |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.1 | 42.4% | 25.6% | 77.1% | |
| 19.8 | 39.7% | 30.8% | 41.7% | |
| 10.5 | 41.6% | 37.5% | 38.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 |
| 14.6% |
| 70.2% |
| 17.2 | 47.9% | 38.7% | 74.2% |
| 15.0 | 40.9% | 32.0% | 74.1% |