116-115
FINALLos
Angeles Lakers
61-40|L10: 4-6
Minnesota
Timberwolves
56-44|L10: 4-6
Los Angeles Lakers
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 68-20 | 0.773 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/28 | L 108-122 | |
| 10/27 | W 127-120 |
| 66-21 |
| 0.759 |
| 1.5 |
| 3 | 57-30 | 0.655 | 10.5 |
| 4 | 56-30 | 0.651 | 11.0 |
| 5 | 54-34 | 0.614 | 14.0 |
| 6 | 50-37 | 0.575 | 17.5 |
| 7 | 48-38 | 0.558 | 19.0 |
| 8 | 44-41 | 0.518 | 22.5 |
| 9 | 43-43 | 0.500 | 24.0 |
| 10 | 40-47 | 0.460 | 27.5 |
| 11 | 29-57 | 0.337 | 38.0 |
| 12 | 26-58 | 0.310 | 40.0 |
| 13 | 26-61 | 0.299 | 41.5 |
| 14 | 23-63 | 0.267 | 44.0 |
| 15 | 23-63 | 0.267 | 44.0 |
| 10/25 | W 128-110 |
| 10/22 | L 109-119 |
| 10/18 | L 116-117 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/28 | L 114-127 | |
| 10/26 | W 114-110 | |
| 10/25 | L 110-128 | |
| 10/23 | W 118-114 | |
| 10/17 | L 110-126 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33.3 | 47.2% | 36.2% | 76.9% | |
| 25.0 | 52.7% | 0.0% | 62.3% | |
| 24.8 | 44.4% | 23.6% | 64.2% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.5 |
| 39.0% |
| 76.7% |
| 21.0 | 47.2% | 28.4% | 78.0% |
| 20.0 | 47.6% | 37.5% | 68.3% |
| Category | MIN Offense | LAL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1192.5 ORtg | #15112.2 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1811.6% | #1613.9% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #437.2% | #1235.1% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | LAL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #6109.4 DRtg | #495.4 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1314.1% | #2411.9% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #835.0% | #1835.5% | LAL |