116-115
FINALLos
Angeles Lakers
44-30|L10: 9-1
Minnesota
Timberwolves
42-31|L10: 6-4
Los Angeles Lakers
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57-17 | 0.770 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/27 | L 108-122 | |
| 10/26 |
| 54-19 |
| 0.740 |
| 2.5 |
| 3 | 44-27 | 0.620 | 11.5 |
| 4 | 44-29 | 0.603 | 12.5 |
| 5 | 44-30 | 0.595 | 13.0 |
| 6 | 42-30 | 0.583 | 14.0 |
| 7 | 42-31 | 0.575 | 14.5 |
| 8 | 37-34 | 0.521 | 18.5 |
| 9 | 36-37 | 0.493 | 20.5 |
| 10 | 34-39 | 0.466 | 22.5 |
| 11 | 26-47 | 0.356 | 30.5 |
| 12 | 24-48 | 0.333 | 32.0 |
| 13 | 23-48 | 0.324 | 32.5 |
| 14 | 21-51 | 0.292 | 35.0 |
| 15 | 19-54 | 0.260 | 37.5 |
| 10/24 | W 128-110 |
| 10/21 | L 109-119 |
| 10/17 | L 116-117 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/27 | L 114-127 | |
| 10/26 | W 114-110 | |
| 10/24 | L 110-128 | |
| 10/22 | W 118-114 | |
| 10/17 | L 110-126 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.7 | 47.2% | 36.3% | 76.0% | |
| 23.4 | 49.3% | 35.1% | 84.9% | |
| 21.2 | 50.8% | 30.7% | 71.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29.4 |
| 39.3% |
| 76.1% |
| 21.0 | 47.3% | 27.6% | 79.5% |
| 14.2 | 50.4% | 42.7% | 60.1% |
| Category | MIN Offense | LAL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #794.4 ORtg | #20113.6 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1911.7% | #1314.2% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #337.5% | #1535.6% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | LAL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #11111.3 DRtg | #496.4 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1513.9% | #2512.0% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1835.8% | #1835.5% | Even |