104-115
FINALNew
York Knicks
48-26|L10: 6-4
Minnesota
Timberwolves
41-30|L10: 6-4
New York Knicks
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-20 | 0.714 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/21 | W 132-125 | |
| 12/19 |
| — |
| 2 | 46-24 | 0.657 | 4.0 |
| 3 | 48-26 | 0.649 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 41-28 | 0.594 | 8.5 |
| 5 | 42-29 | 0.592 | 8.5 |
| 6 | 39-32 | 0.549 | 11.5 |
| 7 | 37-33 | 0.529 | 13.0 |
| 8 | 38-35 | 0.521 | 13.5 |
| 9 | 36-34 | 0.514 | 14.0 |
| 10 | 36-36 | 0.500 | 15.0 |
| 11 | 30-39 | 0.435 | 19.5 |
| 12 | 30-41 | 0.423 | 20.5 |
| 13 | 18-51 | 0.261 | 31.5 |
| 14 | 17-50 | 0.254 | 31.5 |
| 15 | 17-54 | 0.239 | 33.5 |
| 12/18 | W 114-113 |
| 12/16 | W 124-113 |
| 12/13 | W 132-120 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/21 | W 103-100 | |
| 12/19 | W 112-107 | |
| 12/17 | L 110-116 | |
| 12/14 | W 117-103 | |
| 12/12 | W 127-120 |
| Category | MIN Offense | NYK Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #794.3 ORtg | #5109.7 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1711.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #437.4% | #1635.6% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | NYK Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #11111.2 DRtg | #1491.9 ORtg | NYK |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1514.0% | #410.5% | NYK |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1835.9% | #536.7% | MIN |
| 25.6 | 45.5% | 34.8% | 80.1% |
| 19.5 | 48.1% | 34.9% | 82.0% |
| 16.4 | 47.9% | 36.2% | 67.1% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29.4 | 48.6% | 39.2% | 76.2% | |
| 21.0 | 47.2% | 27.5% | 80.5% | |
| 14.3 | 50.4% | 43.4% | 60.4% |