105-111
FINALOrlando
Magic
45-44|L10: 4-6
Minnesota
Timberwolves
53-35|L10: 5-5
Orlando Magic
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-32 | 0.610 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/30 | W 100-86 | |
| 10/29 |
| — |
| 2 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 6.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 8 | 4-4 | 0.500 | 9.0 |
| 9 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 10 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 11 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 15.0 |
| 12 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 20.0 |
| 13 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 25.0 |
| 14 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 26.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 33.0 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/30 | W 83-77 |
| Category | MIN Offense | ORL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #583.7 ORtg | #17102.9 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #611.4% | #516.3% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #536.2% | #433.1% | Even |
| Category | MIN Defense | ORL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #15101.7 DRtg | #882.6 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2613.5% | #1311.8% | ORL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1434.9% | #1035.5% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.1 | 45.8% | 37.5% | 80.2% | |
| 16.4 | 41.0% | 32.3% | 77.8% | |
| 15.0 | 47.3% | 3.8% | 64.8% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 |
| 14.1% |
| 70.5% |
| 17.2 | 48.4% | 37.9% | 75.3% |
| 15.0 | 41.2% | 32.4% | 69.7% |