109-98
FINALOrlando
Magic
40-46|L10: 5-5
Minnesota
Timberwolves
32-50|L10: 2-8
Orlando Magic
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/10 | L 83-93 | |
| 11/8 |
| — |
| 2 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 6.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 8 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 35-51 | 0.407 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 13 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 23.0 |
| 14 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 25.0 |
| 15 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 29.0 |
| 11/6 | W 106-103 |
| 11/5 | L 82-95 |
| 11/3 | L 103-105 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/7 | L 88-95 | |
| 11/6 | L 81-93 | |
| 11/4 | L 86-88 | |
| 11/3 | W 112-109 | |
| 11/1 | W 92-83 |
| Category | MIN Offense | ORL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1983.9 ORtg | #8103.6 DRtg | ORL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2113.0% | #1615.4% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1435.2% | #1735.7% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | ORL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #21106.2 DRtg | #2282.8 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2714.6% | #2814.1% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1035.1% | #1235.3% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.5 | 60.6% | 1.3% | 57.1% | |
| 14.4 | 50.5% | 2.3% | 66.1% | |
| 13.3 | 41.0% | 34.7% | 56.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.4 |
| 7.9% |
| 83.0% |
| 17.0 | 44.4% | 36.1% | 66.5% |
| 12.3 | 49.8% | 7.7% | 53.1% |