96-110
FINALChicago
Bulls
30-52|L10: 4-6
Orlando
Magic
45-44|L10: 4-6
Chicago Bulls
Orlando Magic
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-32 | 0.610 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/19 | L 82-110 | |
| 2/18 |
| 49-33 |
| 0.598 |
| 1.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 6.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 8 | 4-4 | 0.500 | 9.0 |
| 9 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 10 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 11 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 15.0 |
| 12 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 20.0 |
| 13 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 25.0 |
| 14 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 26.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 33.0 |
| 2/15 | W 88-69 |
| 2/14 | L 72-90 |
| 2/12 | L 111-119 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/18 | W 99-94 | |
| 2/16 | L 97-99 | |
| 2/14 | L 98-99 | |
| 2/13 | L 88-98 | |
| 2/11 | W 92-83 |
| Category | ORL Offense | CHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #882.6 ORtg | #20104.1 DRtg | ORL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1311.8% | #1714.8% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1035.5% | #232.2% | CHI |
| Category | ORL Defense | CHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #17102.9 DRtg | #2179.2 ORtg | CHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #516.3% | #2313.1% | ORL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #433.1% | #835.6% | CHI |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.1 | 40.7% | 37.3% | 82.6% | |
| 13.5 | 45.5% | 20.6% | 59.5% | |
| 11.7 | 40.6% | 3.0% | 60.7% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.1 | 45.8% |
| 37.5% |
| 80.2% |
| 16.4 | 41.0% | 32.3% | 77.8% |
| 15.0 | 47.3% | 3.8% | 64.8% |