107-110
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
53-35|L10: 5-5
Orlando
Magic
45-44|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Orlando Magic
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-32 | 0.610 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/26 | W 108-91 | |
| 3/22 | W 101-94 |
| — |
| 2 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 6.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 8 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 15.0 |
| 11 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 25.0 |
| 13 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 26.0 |
| 14 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 33.0 |
| 3/19 | W 96-80 |
| 3/16 | W 111-95 |
| 3/15 | L 99-106 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/27 | W 97-95 | |
| 3/25 | L 104-110 | |
| 3/23 | W 96-74 | |
| 3/22 | W 109-85 | |
| 3/20 | W 109-93 |
| Category | ORL Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #984.1 ORtg | #8106.0 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1412.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1135.3% | #1534.9% | ORL |
| Category | ORL Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #23113.5 DRtg | #884.4 ORtg | ORL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #417.8% | #511.5% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #433.1% | #635.9% | Even |
| 23.2 | 51.0% | 14.6% | 70.2% | |
| 17.2 | 47.9% | 38.7% | 74.2% | |
| 15.0 | 40.9% | 32.0% | 74.1% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.1 | 46.2% | 38.2% | 79.8% | |
| 16.4 | 40.9% | 30.9% | 77.9% | |
| 15.0 | 49.8% | 0.0% | 62.9% |