86-128
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
17-65|L10: 0-10
Orlando
Magic
54-34|L10: 5-5
Minnesota Timberwolves
Orlando Magic
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62-20 | 0.756 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/2 | L 97-129 | |
| 10/30 |
| — |
| 2 | 58-24 | 0.707 | 4.0 |
| 3 | 56-26 | 0.683 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 10.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 18.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 20.0 |
| 7 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 21.0 |
| 8 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 25.0 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 27.0 |
| 10 | 37-51 | 0.420 | 28.0 |
| 11 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 32.0 |
| 12 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 38.0 |
| 13 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 39.0 |
| 14 | 22-61 | 0.265 | 40.5 |
| 15 | 19-63 | 0.232 | 43.0 |
| 10/29 | W 96-85 |
| 10/27 | L 116-117 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/29 | L 70-96 | |
| 10/28 | W 112-83 |
| Category | ORL Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1587.0 ORtg | #25112.0 DRtg | ORL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2512.7% | #1614.4% | ORL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1236.0% | #2537.9% | ORL |
| Category | ORL Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #3101.4 DRtg | #2781.5 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2413.9% | #2813.4% | ORL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1234.8% | #837.0% | ORL |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.2 | 45.4% | 31.3% | 76.4% | |
| 19.2 | 44.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 | 59.1% |
| 31.9% |
| 63.5% |
| 12.8 | 43.3% | 0.0% | 55.5% |
| 0.0% |
| 61.4% |
| 15.1 | 47.0% | 29.6% | 59.8% |
| 13.6 | 41.2% | 36.2% | 40.5% |