110-126
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
29-22|L10: 5-5
Philadelphia
76ers
26-24|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Philadelphia 76ers
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36-13 | 0.735 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/16 | L 120-126 | |
| 10/9 |
| — |
| 2 | 32-18 | 0.640 | 4.5 |
| 3 | 33-19 | 0.635 | 4.5 |
| 4 | 33-21 | 0.611 | 5.5 |
| 5 | 29-23 | 0.558 | 8.5 |
| 6 | 27-22 | 0.551 | 9.0 |
| 7 | 26-24 | 0.520 | 10.5 |
| 8 | 26-25 | 0.510 | 11.0 |
| 9 | 25-27 | 0.481 | 12.5 |
| 10 | 25-28 | 0.472 | 13.0 |
| 11 | 21-28 | 0.429 | 15.0 |
| 12 | 21-31 | 0.404 | 16.5 |
| 13 | 13-35 | 0.271 | 22.5 |
| 14 | 13-38 | 0.255 | 24.0 |
| 15 | 12-36 | 0.250 | 23.5 |
| 10/7 | L 134-135 |
| 10/4 | W 126-116 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | L 98-128 | |
| 10/4 | L 104-113 | |
| 10/2 | L 84-99 |
| Category | PHI Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2190.2 ORtg | #5110.1 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #810.8% | #1414.0% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2134.9% | #1335.3% | MIN |
| Category | PHI Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #12111.5 DRtg | #794.5 ORtg | PHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #714.8% | #1311.3% | PHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #734.8% | #337.7% | PHI |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.8 | 48.7% | 38.4% | 78.2% | |
| 21.9 | 48.8% | 30.4% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.3 |
| 81.2% |
| 14.4 | 50.7% | 45.3% | 62.5% |
| 36.6% |
| 84.8% |
| 24.8 | 48.7% | 32.7% | 88.0% |
| 16.0 | 41.5% | 35.1% | 66.5% |