89-124
FINALPortland
Trail Blazers
28-38|L10: 1-9
San
Antonio Spurs
60-20|L10: 6-4
Portland Trail Blazers
San Antonio Spurs
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-16 | 0.758 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/21 | L 89-93 | |
| 4/18 |
| 47-19 |
| 0.712 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 41-25 | 0.621 | 9.0 |
| 4 | 41-25 | 0.621 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 40-26 | 0.606 | 10.0 |
| 6 | 38-28 | 0.576 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 9 | 34-32 | 0.515 | 16.0 |
| 10 | 33-33 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 11 | 28-38 | 0.424 | 22.0 |
| 12 | 26-40 | 0.394 | 24.0 |
| 13 | 23-43 | 0.348 | 27.0 |
| 14 | 22-44 | 0.333 | 28.0 |
| 15 | 21-45 | 0.318 | 29.0 |
| 4/16 | L 107-125 |
| 4/15 | L 103-104 |
| 4/13 | L 94-97 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/22 | W 114-98 | |
| 4/20 | W 121-97 | |
| 4/18 | W 127-102 | |
| 4/17 | W 112-91 | |
| 4/16 | W 120-99 |
| Category | SAS Offense | POR Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #390.7 ORtg | #24105.9 DRtg | SAS |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1411.8% | #1714.8% | POR |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #140.2% | #2637.0% | SAS |
| Category | SAS Defense | POR Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #11103.1 DRtg | #1582.8 ORtg | POR |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2513.8% | #1011.7% | POR |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2235.7% | #1834.3% | SAS |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.0 | 51.3% | 4.1% | 77.4% | |
| 15.1 | 53.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.6 | 46.1% |
| 0.0% |
| 50.9% |
J.J. Hickson | 15.1 | - | - | - |
| 14.1% |
| 74.2% |
| 15.8 | 48.1% | 0.0% | 66.0% |
Manu Ginóbili | 13.4 | - | - | - |